Cover Story 1: Dipankar Chatterjee



Self-Help Group Model of Micro finance in India: Impact and Challenges


With inspiring ideas, novel approaches and firm determination, local institutions have successfully provided micro-credit and saving facilities to the poor, they have evolved simple innovative lending methodologies and loan products, established that they have financial technologies to provide quality service on a commercially viable basis.
Written by Dipankar Chatterjee 



INTRODUCTION
Since a long time the Self Help Groups (SHGs) are in existence in the country which registered rapid strides. Over the past two decades, serious attempts have been made by local institutions in different parts of the world to assist the poorest by responding to their financial needs. We know to-day how these institutions have overcome numerous obstacles and developed innovative mechanisms to provide financial services to such people.
SHG meeting at Mregbandi village, Jharkhand (Photo: Atanu Deb)
They have succeeded in reaching the segments of the population which were excluded by banks and have demonstrated that, the poor are good credit risks and have high savings propensity. In the developing countries, the poor without adequate access to productive land or paid employment support themselves through a number of self-employed activities in agriculture, trade, crafts, etc. the financial services they require are insignificant.

The administrative cost per micro-finance transaction is said to be high. The poor do not qualify as suitable clients. Since they do not have sufficient assets to offer as collateral or security, lack of access to credit, for micro-enterprise or other income-generating activities prevents the poor to improve efficiency, productivity and participation in economic life.
            With inspiring ideas, novel approaches and firm determination, local institutions have successfully provided micro-credit and saving facilities to the poor, they have evolved simple innovative lending methodologies and loan products, established that they have financial technologies to provide quality service on a commercially viable basis. In spite of remarkable success of these micro-finance programmes, the availability of such, services to the poor are limited. The challenge, therefore, is to ensure a sustainable flow of quality financial services to the poorest of the poor. Against this backdrop an attempt has been made here to understand the role of micro-finance in social inclusion of the excluded section of the rural populace with reference to women. 
GENESIS AND FUNCTIONING OF SHG
            Since independence, the government has implemented several developmental programmers for rural development and poverty reduction. Recognizing the imperative need for upliftment of women in society from the last two decades much importance is given for empowerment of poor women in rural area. Once such programme is self help groups. The emergence of SHGs has proved a panacea for the rural poor women. Empowerment process of rural women has accelerated with the establishment of SHGs. The women, who are below poverty line and who face situations of extreme poverty, are benefiting through SHGs. A group of 10 to12 women of same strata and common ideology are motivated by non-governmental organization (NGOs) in general to form SHGs account in bank. This pooled funds from group savings is rotated among the members of the group as group loans for meeting immediate consumption and other purposes. In due course of time (say about 6months), under the NABARD scheme SHG –bank linkage the bank provides loans to the group as per requirement. For linking SHGs with banks, a pilot project was introduced by NABARD in 1992 to encourage thrift and savings amongst rural poor and to supplement their credit needs through banking system. Now days, the financing of SHGs has become the main activity of banks in the formal sector are actively delivering micro credit to women SHGs. Thus SHGs have become part and parcel of rural economy.
SHG and Bank linkage (Photo: Atanu Deb)
           NABARD describes SHGs as homogeneous affinity of rural poor, voluntarily formed to save small amounts of their credit needs and revolving their resources among the members, both for consumption and small productions. Thus, SHGs are a blend of non-governmental organizations and group of individuals, basically poor women, organized together for tackling social and community problems like unemployment, medical issues, watershed management and livelihood generation besides group financial management. In SHG moment, the role of facilitator is being played by voluntary association, non-governmental organizations and other Self Help Promotion Institutions (SHPIs) particularly for linking with the bank for channeling micro credit to the poor women through SHGs.
OBJECTIVES OF SHGS
1)      To inculcate SHG approach among women folk so that their dependence on other groups can be minimized.
2)      To promote the habit of savings among rural women so that they can take loans from banks on the basis of their collected savings .
3)      To motivate women entrepreneurs and to make them capable of establishing small and cottage industries.
4)      To enhance women’s participation in their development programmes to make them more effective in improving their status.
5)      To help in the empowerment in their health, education, and sanitation among rural women.
6)      To develop skills and capabilities of rural women folk  in various agriculture related activities.
7)      To get NGOs involved in the empowerment of living standard of rural women.
8)      To develop and organize collective leadership structure among rural women.
9)       To provide access to money, infrastructure, and marketing facilities to rural women so that their productivity and efficiency can be increased.

IMPACT OF SHGS

SHGs have facilitated the process of micro credit for the rural women folk. An access to micro credit has been helpful in improving their bargaining power, participation and decision making power. Micro Credit is helping rural poor women to start income generating projects, take part in credit services and planning and freedom in expenditure management at their household levels. In addition to the financial analysis of SHGs, the non-financial areas such as social security and gender dynamics are also effected by the SHG Movement. Indeed, poverty reduction is much less an issue of numbers but rather ideas and concepts. The following is an analysis of the non-financial impact of SHGs.
Political
Political engagement includes active involvement by SHGs in government including local assemblies, Lok Sabha or Panchayati Rai Institutions (PRIs). One of the key benefits of SHGs is women’s empowerment and this can be seen with the number of women involved in public affairs. While the number of women actually involved in politics is still very low, research has indicated that of those women that stand for election, over 70% had won their seat (APMAS, 2005). And, the female contribution to civil issues ranges from issue of ration cards, laying of pucca roads, building of school, ensuring appointments in vacant positions in schools and health centres, recovery of river bank lands from encroachers and laying of drinking water pipes (APMAS, 2005). As mentioned, the number of women involved in politics is low. But, the trend is definitely moving up. A mere 5 years ago, the likelihood of women contesting panchayat election was extremely low. Their presence today is affecting the perception of women and their role in the political arena. They are being recognized as an important group with serious concerns. The role of SHGs is both as an inspiration and as a financer. Impoverished women develop greater language and financial skills through the SHG which provides the building blocks for higher levels of confidence to engage the world. Also, the SHG sometimes finances the campaign of its members that stand for election. SHGs not only empower its members but also wield a powerful political role as a group as well. At local village meetings, the leaders of SHGs are often invited to attend and speak (APMAS, 2005).
Social Harmony
Broadly defined, social harmony encompasses the equality and integrity of relationships between different social groups. To frame the following analysis, SHGs typically consists of the following social groups:
• Schedule Caste (SC)
• Scheduled Tribe (ST)
• Minorities (MN)
• Backward Caste (BC)
• Other Caste (OC)
The compositions of SHGs are sometimes exclusively one particular social group or a mix. The impact of SHGs on social harmony has also been mixed. While it has been observed that in groups with mixed membership had group leaders that came from a variety of the social groups. In the vast majority of instances, groups leaders were almost exclusively from the dominant social groups’ category. This demonstrates a lack of equality and unity across caste divisions. Given the relatively young history of SHGs, it is to be expected that their impact on bridging centuries old divisions would be slow.
Social Justice
Social justice is the presence of moral and ethical conduct in areas that are historically typified with backward and abusive customs. There have been several occurrences of SHGs resolving disputes between members and the community at large. These instances include initiating legal action, arbitration, divorce and others. While there has long been dispute resolution mechanisms in villages, in the past it was controlled by men. Now, there are instances of women, SHG members, being involved in resolving disputes. Whether or not the women are working for their own interests or in the case for justice varies, regardless SHGs’ impact on the political arena is certainly being seen also in social justice, albeit in a slow and evolutionary process.
Community
Being a group based organization of members of similar caste and geography, the community resources that are shared by are affected by the SHG. Recent analysis has shown that the impact that SHGs have on the community at large have been minor. There have been few instances of significant contributions from SHGs to education, family planning, eradication of child labour and hygiene. To interpret these findings further it should be noted that such community problems are often large financial commitments which SHGs simply do not have the capacity to afford. Also, of the few instances where there have been significant contributions from the SHGs to the community, the SHG demonstrated a clear leadership role and rallied the support of the entire village. This demonstrates that given the opportunity, SHGs, assuming they have the capacity, can act as a director of community development. The perception of taking of a women’s based organization taking a leading role for the betterment of the greater good has monumental impacts on the local community. Gender dynamics begin to balance in instances such as these.
Livelihoods
Livelihoods, meaning a persons’ economic activity, is an area that is vitally important to SHGs. The loans that SHG members receive are intended to improve their livelihoods so that they can receive greater and more steadier cash flows. In rural areas, livelihoods range from agriculture farming, animal husbandry, dairy and various other goods and services activities. Experience has shown that SHGs have had improved livelihoods to the extent of providing the leveraging needed to start an enterprise. However, the interventions to introduce new livelihoods or refine existing ones that could yield better economic results were done by external agencies.

CHALLENGES FACED BY SHGS
Many challenges are present in the path of successful implementation of the SHG programme for the empowerment of poor rural women.
Inadequate Coverage
A skewed growth pattern of SHG programme is observed in the country. This programme has failed to cover the whole India. It has largely concentrated in southern region (Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka) of the country. The areas (U.P. M.P. Assam, Bihar, W.B. Rajasthan, and Orissa) where poverty and unemployment are wide spread are not adequately covered by the SHG programme. In the same manner, the existing caste system and the poor economic condition of rural women to contribute for saving and membership fee to SHG deprived empowerment through SHG has suffered in terms of either exclusion of deserving poor women or elimination of poor women in SHG system due to above constraints.
Lack of Basic Infrastructure Facilities
It has been experienced that because of inadequacy of basic infrastructure facilities require for income generation activities such as training, marketing, transport etc in rural areas, it has become difficult for women members of SHGs to make optimum and efficient use of loans. In this situation, it has become difficult to repay the loans of banks in time. Because of this fact, they have trapped in debt.
Woman empowerment- A Myth? (at Kakdwip, West Bengal, Photo-Atanu Deb
Lack of Required Skills and Linkages
The contribution of SHGs in the empowerment process of rural poor women largely depends on the ability and willingness of women members to invest financial resources in new, productive and innovative lines, but the reality is that these loans has been used mainly in the traditional sector viz. agriculture, animal husbandry  and cottage industries. Illiteracy of rural women puts a question mark on the quality of SHG’s functioning. Inadequate training and lack of skills and capacity building in rural women are the factors responsible for the poor performance of SHGs.
Paucity of Affective Leadership and Governance   
It is a known fact that the quality of leadership and governance is a key factor responsible for the success of SHGs it has been found that because of poor quality of leadership and organizational abilities the performance of SHGs has not been up to the mark. It is also found that as SHGs grow older, their quality suffers. Another concern is that a large part of the benefits of SHGs are being snatched away by the dominant leaders of rural society and the poor needy women are deprived away from the benefits from SHGs because of weaker position in the society, Lack of awareness and fear of exclusion from the group. This tendency has widened the gap between rich and poor section of the rural society. It is urgently needed that the benefits of SHGs should be percolated to all the deserving members of SHGs particularly among poor women.
Over Burdened Rural Women  
Because of active participation in the formation and implementation of SHGs, the burden on the shoulders of women has almost doubled. After completing different burdensome household chores, the women members have to engage themselves in productive and efficient utilization of loans and thus try to repay the loans. This has caused deterioration in the health of rural women. 
Conclusion
Microfinance programmes are premised on the belief that access to financial services will improve the ability of the poor to harness their inherent capacity. In the process of capacity building they can uplift themselves above the poverty line. Literature has underlined that microfinance has made significant headway in extending low cost credit to the rural poor. Success of these programmes have been assessed in terms of repayment rates and cost recovery. But the primary goal of microfinance programmes is to improve client welfare. Credit delivery should be sustainable and should lead to increase in efficiency and equity by increasing their income and productivity boosting expenditure like those on health and education.
                                                                          **********
Dipankar Chatterjee. Assistant Professor, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda University, Faculty Centre IRTDM, Morabadi, Ranchi-834008
Email: dipcha123@gmail.com






No comments:

Post a Comment